I used Nano Energizer in My Tractor Fleet - Waikato Read More >> I used Nano Energizer in my tractor (part of my contracting fleet). This tractor has a weak cylinder and due to the fact it has done almost 10,000 hours it also smokes heavily. After using Nano Energizer (after approx 400 hours) it has completely stopped smoking and the weak cylinder seems to have healed itself! Amazing but true! It runs fine now. I would highly recommend this product to anyone. I was planning to overhaul the engine because I didn't think there was any other options available to me. I used Nano Energizer on the off chance that it could help (as a last resort). I can't believe the difference it made. It has really paid off. It’s now a great starter and the smoking has completely stopped. You would not think it could be the same machine. I have now reorder more Nano Energizer for another Tractor. Glenn Jackson Golf Road Taumarunui [ Close X ] |
Waikato Testimonial Read More >> - 15/09/2011 Dear Team at Nano Tech NZ, Dear Team at Nano Tech NZ, I put Nano Energizer into the Honda on 26 August and now have 2 follow up reports of fuel usage and will keep on monitoring for a while. The fuel consumption as improved significantly. I just want to see the occurrence of ling steady trips and town dr urrence of ling steady trips and town driving a bit iving a bit more clearly before II II make real conclusions make real conclusions about Nano Energizer chemical fuel consumption = 11.937 l/100km After adding chemical 10.347 l/100km after one tank of town driving 7.466 l/100km after 1 tank of long trip driving ank of long trip driving Overall more than 30% better, but need to see a mix of town and distance driving before I get a new average? Very satisfied with this result so far. I will probably want to do my two other cars for benefit and nefit with stats for your product back--up in a couple of weeks time, when the numbers settle. Your Sincerely Mr Smit Waikato [ Close X ]
|
First Time User Read More >> - 22/8/2011 To Whom it my concern First time user of Nano Energizer I work as a travelling Businessman, driving a Holden Adventra V6 2006 model. I put the Nano Energizer into the engine at 121,000 km. Unsure what result would be. At which time I was getting on average 13.5lts to 100 km around town. After a very short time I noticed the engine was quieter and seemed to feel smoother. But the thing I want to mention is that my fuel economy increased noticeably. After about 1000 km, I could differently see that I was not using the same amount of fuel around town and on the open road. It seems to be now averaging around 11.0ltrs to 100km now on open road and 12.4ltrs around town. A 18% drop in fuel usage after having Nano Energizer I have just brought another pack for my son’s car and look forward to seeing if my son notices a difference. Best Regards Mr S Newman Auckland [ Close X ]
|
Cowboy Read More >> - July 2011 I was talking to the guy at Nano Energizer about my old Big Horn, It is a Diesel that has had a hard life. It is at the point that I thought it needs some real work done on the motor. I added the Nano Energizer to the oil so it could get to the worn parts. Well I didn’t think it would make much difference. But it did, the compression is heaps better, and the power it has now is awesome. The engine is quieter and it don’t smoke much now either. Cowboy Kerepehi [ Close X ]
|
Korea Automotive Technology Institute Read More >> |
Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials Testing Report Read More >> |
Kyungpook National University Comparison Read More >> |
Kyungpook National University Comparison Read More >> |
nanoTec International Piston Compressor Test Report Read More >> |
nanoTec International Automobile Field Test Report Read More >> |
Union Chemical Institute - MotorcycleTest - Page1 Read More >> |
Union Chemical Institute - MotorcycleTest - Page2 Read More >> |
Yeungnam University Testing Result Read More >> |
Chuck this stuff in your car Read More >> Wow!! Having trained in engineering design, and studied the efficiencies of ceramic technology in production and manufacture, I was in ‘boots and all’ for treating my cars with Nanoenergizer and recording the changes if any. My first application was to a 2002 toyota Estima 3.0 V6 [175,000 on the clock]; this tank was guzzling between 7 and 8 kms/ litre. Within 100 km’s after treatment, I noticed an increased launched from stand still, at reduced applied accelerator. Within 250 km’s of application, I managed a whopping (for the type of vehicle) 11 km’s/ litre when car was not fully loaded, and 10.3 km’s/ litre when loaded. We are just approaching 1000 km’s after treatment, and even on short trips with a lot of stop start, this beast is still only chewing through around 10 kms/ litre – I’m stoked!! I believe given what short trips used to cost me…I’ve saved upwards of $80 in gas already in this vehicle, and as an engineer, I know when the wife jumps in and runs it to town cold, Nanoenergizer’s ceramic technology is going to guarantee me less wear, and ultimately a longer engine life. My second vehicle that I treated is a 1999 Subaru Forester stb [86,000 on the clock]. This thing had become a huge supporter of the oil companies as I chewed through around 5 km/ litre (if I was lucky). In serious need of a service, my forester was becoming an Achilles heel to my fuel budget. With nothing to lose, I treated it with Nanoenergizer and within 80 kms of treatment, the engine was beginning to purr, and quietened down significantly…it sounded like the day I bought it. Within 150 km’s I was getting 8 – 9 km’s/ per litre of gas…probably more economy than I have ever got from my baby. I’ve just passed 300 km’s after treatment, and it is hauling some serious ass on acceleration. On ‘giving it some’ the other day, I reached the redline cut out, before I had a chance to change gear; this car is running sweeter than the day I bought it, and I’m looking forward to seeing the diagnostics from Subaru when I send it in for it’s service. Chuck this stuff in your car – it’s win…win!! [ Close X ] |
I cannot believe it is the same vehicle. Read More >> - Put some Nano energizer in my 96 Isuzu mu. Good stuff. no more smokey exhaust, engines quieted down and getting around 15 percent better fuel economy and significantly more power. I cannot believe it is the same vehicle. Slipped some in the trans as well, it seems to be going through the gears smoother too. Recommend it to anyone with older diesel motor [ Close X ]
|
Increased power and throttle response and lower fuel consumption Read More >> |
Savings of 20.76% fuel costs - spreadsheet Read More >> Summary: Savings of 20.76% fuel costs and only required 1 l of oil, where before oil usage was 0.5 litres oil per month. (average fuel cost taken @$2.07) | 11987 km @11.937 litres /100km =1431 | litres @ $2.07 | 2962.17 | 11987km@9.458 l/100km=1134 | liters @ $2.07 | 2347.38 | | SAVING IN 10 months on 11987km | $614.79 | Date | Trip meter | Odometer | Litres | Comments | Cum km | Cum litres | Km/L | L/100 km | cum l/100 | Cum from 11.94 | | | 236912 | | | | | | | | | 26-Aug | 315 | 237227 | 37.6 | Before Chemical insertion- then added chemical | 315 | 38 | 8.38 | 11.937 | 11.937 | | Sept | | | | | | | | 11.937 | | | 7 | 415 | 237642 | 42.94 | Town trips | 415 | 43 | 9.66 | 10.347 | 10.347 | 13.32% | 9 | 268 | 237910 | 20.01 | Hamilton Auckland Airport trip | 683 | 63 | 13.39 | 7.466 | 9.217 | 22.79% | 10 | 323 | 238233 | 34.04 | To wellington | 1006 | 97 | 9.49 | 10.539 | 9.641 | 19.23% | 12 | 475 | 238708 | 43.51 | To wellington - Long run Chch | 1481 | 141 | 10.92 | 9.160 | 9.487 | 20.53% | 15 | 470 | 239178 | 41.13 | To wellington - | 1951 | 182 | 11.43 | 8.751 | 9.310 | 22.01% | 18 | 439 | 239617 | 42.87 | From Wellington - Taupo | 2390 | 225 | 10.24 | 9.765 | 9.393 | 21.31% | 25 | 544 | 240160 | 48.28 | Auckland and around | 2934 | 273 | 11.27 | 8.875 | 9.297 | 22.11% | 27 | 538 | 240698 | 44.39 | Auckland and around | 3472 | 317 | 12.12 | 8.251 | 9.135 | 23.47% | 30 | 454 | 241152 | 44.66 | Auckland and around | 3926 | 362 | 10.17 | 9.837 | 9.216 | 22.79% | 10-Oct | 513 | 241665 | 50.01 | Hamilton and around | 4439 | 412 | 10.26 | 9.749 | 9.278 | 22.28% | 25-Oct | 434 | 242100 | 43.06 | Hamilton and around | 4873 | 455 | 10.08 | 9.922 | 9.335 | 21.80% | 7-Nov | 459 | 242559 | 49.79 | Hamilton and around | 5332 | 505 | 9.22 | 10.847 | 9.465 | 20.71% | 3-Nov | 495 | 243054 | 46.57 | Hamilton-around-Rotoroa | 5827 | 551 | 10.63 | 9.408 | 9.460 | 20.75% | 15-Dec | 511 | 243565 | 50.1 | Hamilton-around-Rotoroa | 6338 | 601 | 10.20 | 9.804 | 9.488 | 20.51% | 5-Jan | 480 | 244045 | 46.54 | Hamilton-around-Rotoroa | 6818 | 648 | 10.31 | 9.696 | 9.503 | 20.39% | 25-Jan | 524 | 244570 | 50.69 | Hamilton-around-Rotoroa | 7342 | 699 | 10.34 | 9.674 | 9.515 | 20.29% | 12-Feb | 1024 | 245594 | 94.38 | 48+46.38 Hamilton Rotoroa | 8366 | 793 | 10.85 | 9.217 | 9.478 | 20.60% | 29-Feb | 1034 | 246628 | 97.45 | Auckland and around 49+48.45 | 9400 | 890 | 10.61 | 9.425 | 9.473 | 20.65% | 30-Mar | 686 | 247314 | 64.36 | Hamilton - around | 10086 | 955 | 10.66 | 9.382 | 9.466 | 20.70% | 2-May | 468 | 247782 | 46.5 | Hamilton - around | 10554 | 1001 | 10.06 | 9.936 | 9.487 | 20.52% | 21-Jun | 1433 | 249215 | 132.5 | Hamilton and surrounds | 11987 | 1134 | 10.82 | 9.246 | 9.458 | 20.76% | | [ Close X ] |
nano results from the farm Read More >> - Hi, I'm a local dairy farmer and have used Nano Energizer in a few of my machines. we put some in my Nissan Safari, done 200Km, now it seems to 'like' higher RPMs. It runs sweeter, at a faster speed. we also tried some in my near new Suzuki Trojan, was consistently getting 155/165Km per tank, now after two or three tank full we are getting 165/175Km per tank, 6/7% improvement. we put it in an old international 786 turbo tractor, after 10 hours of running it is making a lot less smoke. lastly I gave some to my employee for his 94 falcon, 300Km and smokey, he has noticed up to 100Km more per tank and I have noticed when I follow his car there is no more smoke. I would not hesitate to use Nano Energizer again Yours,Paul Matthews [ Close X ]
|
The engine runs much smoother and quieter Read More >> - I put nano energiser into my 1926 Austin 12/4, 6 months ago.As the odometer is not accurate, difficult to show any fuel saving. However, I have found, that the engine runs much smoother and quieter. I have since then put the nano energiser into 2 more of my vintage cars, with similar results, and have just purchased more to put into the rest of my vintage cars. [ Close X ]
|
Reduction in overall noise from the engine Read More >> - I am an owner from new of a 100series 4.2L Toyota Landcruiser 5 speed automatic year of manufacture 2006/7. When I first got the vehicle I was pleasantly surprised at the distance it would travel on a litre of diesel. Typically my On-Board fuel computer would register open road conditions showing 12.5Km/L of fuel consumed. This dropped off over the last few years to 10.6Km/L until I added the NanoEnergizer product into the last oil change. Within less than 1000Km I have returned to 12.6Km/L as my current maximum I have been able to achieve for open road driving. For those who think in litres per 100Km then this equates to 7.94L per 100Km's. One of the biggest changes is the reduction in overall noise from the engine. Hopefully this will extend overall engine life by 30% and will enable me to enjoy my motoring well into my retirement years. I pull a 3 tonne boat with my cruiser as a regular activity. [ Close X ]
|